Plutarch's Maxime cum principibus philosopho esse disserendum

Informationen zum Autor Geert Roskam is Professor of Greek language and literature at KU Leuven. Klappentext The question of the political relevance of philosophy, and of the role which the philosopher should play in the government of his state, was often discussed in Antiquity. Platös ideal of the philosopher-king is well-known, but was precisely his failure to realise his political ideal in Syracuse not the best argument against the philosopher s political engagement? Nevertheless, Platös ideal remained attractive for later Greek thinkers. This is illustrated, for instance, by one of Plutarch s short political works, in which he tries to demonstrate that the philosopher should especially associate with powerful rulers, because he can in this way exert the greatest positive influence on his society and at the same time maximise his personal pleasure. This study provides a thorough analysis of Plutarch s Maxime cum principibus philosopho esse disserendum. A lengthy general introduction deals with the author and the text and discusses each step in Plutarch s argumentation in detail. A systematic lemmatic commentary then provides a systematic complement to the previous analysis of the work, dealing with many problems of textual criticism, explaining all kinds of realia, and discussing a great number of passages through parallels from Plutarch s own oeuvre and from other authors. Inhaltsverzeichnis Acknowledgements Abbreviations Introduction 1. The first steps in the analysis of Maxime cum principibus 1.1. The author 1.1.1. A rich political career 1.1.2. Heir of an old tradition 1.2. The work 1.2.1. A difficult text 1.2.2. The literary genre of Maxime cum principibus 1.2.3. The date of Maxime cum principibus 2. Two further stepping-stones 2.1. Plutarch's evaluation of the political position of his philosophical predecessors 2.1.1. Introduction 2.1.2. The Presocratics 2.1.3. Socrates 2.1.4. Plato 2.1.5. The Academy 2.1.6. Aristotle 2.1.7. The Peripatetics 2.1.8. Provisional conclusions 2.1.9. Philosophical opponents 2.1.10. Conclusion 2.2. Consistency, again and again 3. Plutarch's argument in Maxime cum principibus 3.1. The philosopher's Ï Î¹Î'Πκ Î'á · : humane behaviour for the benefit of the whole community (776a-777b) 3.2. Friendship as the final end of human Î'á ¹Î³Î Ï' (777b-778b) 3.3. The pleasures of the ÏEURÎ Î'ιÏ"ικá Ï' Ï Î¹Î'á ¹Ï Î Ï Î Ï' (778b-f) 3.4. Some concrete examples of Ï Î¹Î'Πκ Î'á · (779a-c) 3.5. Conclusion: Plutarch's political philosophy in Maxime cum principibus 3.5.1. Friendship between the philosopher and the ruler as one of Plutarch's political ideals 3.5.2. Plutarch and power: the philosopher's escape from a harsh reality 3.5.3. Plutarch's political philosophy in Maxime cum principibus: a schematic survey 3.6. Schematic structure of Maxime cum principibus Commentary Bibliography Indices Index nominum Index locorum ...

Autorentext
Geert Roskam is Professor of Greek language and literature at KU Leuven.

Klappentext
The question of the political relevance of philosophy, and of the role which the philosopher should play in the government of his state, was often discussed in Antiquity. Platös ideal of the philosopher-king is well-known, but was precisely his failure to realise his political ideal in Syracuse not the best argument against the philosopher s political engagement? Nevertheless, Platös ideal remained attractive for later Greek thinkers. This is illustrated, for instance, by one of Plutarch s short political works, in which he tries to demonstrate that the philosopher should especially associate with powerful rulers, because he can in this way exert the greatest positive influence on his society and at the same time maximise his personal pleasure. This study provides a thorough analysis of Plutarch s Maxime cum principibus philosopho esse disserendum. A lengthy general introduction deals with the author and the text and discusses each step in Plutarch s argumentation in detail. A systematic lemmatic commentary then provides a systematic complement to the previous analysis of the work, dealing with many problems of textual criticism, explaining all kinds of realia, and discussing a great number of passages through parallels from Plutarch s own oeuvre and from other authors.

Inhalt
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Introduction1. The first steps in the analysis of Maxime cum principibus
1.1. The author
1.1.1. A rich political career
1.1.2. Heir of an old tradition
1.2. The work
1.2.1. A difficult text
1.2.2. The literary genre of Maxime cum principibus
1.2.3. The date of Maxime cum principibus 2. Two further stepping-stones
2.1. Plutarch's evaluation of the political position of his philosophical predecessors
2.1.1. Introduction
2.1.2. The Presocratics
2.1.3. Socrates
2.1.4. Plato
2.1.5. The Academy
2.1.6. Aristotle
2.1.7. The Peripatetics
2.1.8. Provisional conclusions
2.1.9. Philosophical opponents
2.1.10. Conclusion
2.2. Consistency, again and again 3. Plutarch's argument in Maxime cum principibus
3.1. The philosopher's Ï Î¹Î'Πκ Î'á · : humane behaviour for the benefit of the whole community (776a-777b)
3.2. Friendship as the final end of human Î'á ¹Î³Î Ï' (777b-778b)
3.3. The pleasures of the ÏEURÎ Î'ιÏ"ικá Ï' Ï Î¹Î'á ¹Ï Î Ï Î Ï' (778b-f)
3.4. Some concrete examples of Ï Î¹Î'Πκ Î'á · (779a-c)
3.5. Conclusion: Plutarch's political philosophy in Maxime cum principibus
3.5.1. Friendship between the philosopher and the ruler as one of Plutarch's political ideals
3.5.2. Plutarch and power: the philosopher's escape from a harsh reality
3.5.3. Plutarch's political philosophy in Maxime cum principibus: a schematic survey
3.6. Schematic structure of Maxime cum principibus Commentary
Bibliography
Indices
Index nominum
Index locorum

#	Onlineshop	Preis CHF	Versand CHF	Total CHF
1	Seller	0.00	0.00	0.00